Ultimate sd upscale seams fix reddit Hires fix with add detail lora. I'll I wanted to test upscale option (extra and img2img with Ultimate SD upscale) and getting always black square. I’ve just been using Hires Fix, and am totally unfamiliar with the first two. 2) and am using this one since 🔍 Select the ultimate SD upscale script in the scripts section and set the target size type to scale from the image size. From what I've seen, there are three options involved in upscaling in a1111: Hires. Thanks to you and u/SoysauceMafia for looking into this for me. 5) and not spawn many artifacts. So, I'm starting to run tests and taking notes to see if I can reach a conclusion about the best way to make the most out of Software We will use AUTOMATIC1111 Stable Diffusion GUI to perform upscaling. Thanks, I’m liking your suggestions for the captions. Image size - 448 x 576 Wanted size - 2x Extras - upscaler: R-ESRGAN 4x+ Anime6B Img2img - U. Please keep posted images SFW. The only method which works Posted by u/Iraq_PMU - 1 vote and 4 comments Turn off "Seam path" in the Save options or else it will save two copies of the file into your output folder. A lot of people are just discovering this technology, and want to show Ultimate SD Upscaler uses a diffusion proccess that depends on the SD model and the prompt, and an upscaling model RESGRAN, it can also be combined with controlnet. On a side note, I wonder what you think of my idea to improve SD Ultimate Upscale. fix and Loopback Scaler either don't produce the desired output, meaning they change too much about the image (especially faces), or they don't This is a comparison between 8 different upscalers specifically for portrait images generated by Lyriel V1. I know you're not using seams fix but it's a stab in the dark maybe. Im trying to use Ultimate SD upscale for upscaling images. It was there last week. The first image is 1024x1024 from sdxl then 1. I tried every single variation of settings I Upscale the original 512x image without running SD Upscale (use the "extras" tab) or by upscaling the old fashioned way in Krita/GIMP/Photoshop. They'll be much more detailed and, resource-wise, SD only cares about the size of masked area you're inpainting, not Upscale with img2img with controlnet tile/Ultimate SD Upscale script workflow. This means that in the upscaling process it can be added new details to The ultimate upscale script has a bug I think. We will also guide you through steps to download the 4x-UltraSharp algorithm for the Ultimate SD Upscale script. 5 Model. Ultimate SD Upscale extension for AUTOMATIC1111 Stable Diffusion web UI Now you have the opportunity to use a large denoise (0. You can use this GUI on Windows, Mac, or Google Colab. Hi guys. Upscaling from 2K to 4K no problem, using 2k tiles, half tile seam fix and Chess mode type, denoise Hello, I tried every options and I cant get rid of the seams on my image maybe im doing something wrong but I read the FAQ and im stiill not able to fix this. 3, they are very strong in img2img). I tried using controlnet tile + ultimate SD Upscale, but it doesn't work (get a lot of seams on the image, even with low denoising). The repo suggests 12-16 is a good range, which I find works. The overlap is probably going into adjacent tiles. run extra inpaints on seams with gradient masks. 3x and 0. 3-0. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. The total progress sign stops at 75%, but the result shows up on the web UI. fix (x2) Ultimate SD upscale (x4) 1200x600 --> 2400x1200 --> 9600x4800 Notes from this test: Leaving the positive prompt empty helps prevent hallucinations. Hi guys, recently moved from Automatic1111 to Forge but I can’t seem to make tiling and ultimate upscaler sd work properly. 0. How can i fix that? Im using RealESRGAN4x_plus. 3), cherry blossom tree, /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper I'm using Euler a at 40 steps, chess upscale and the description for each image. fix, ControlNet (tile), and Ultimate SD Upscale. ControlNet Tile + ultimate SD upscale anymore because all upscaled images are distorted and the tiles are visible. 1 and even without controlnet!! I was shocked! /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper Yes, Scott Detweiler posted this video yesterday ComfyUI : Ultimate Upscaler - Upscale any image from Stable Diffusion, MidJourney, or photo! Using this method you can tweak as you upscale via clip - pushing in a little detail and subtle corrections as you scale Ultimate SD upscale with Siax for realism, and ESRGAN for art. If you prompt a specific subject (e. I honestly don't understand how you do it. SD Upscale: R-ESRGAN 4x+ Anime6B Yes. it is a simple way 2x upscale using Ultimate SD Upscale and TileE Controlnet. Simply save and then drag and drop relevant image into your Really interesting, I'm looking forward to trying it out. And this is a good reminder for me to play with the upscaling prompt more. So now I'm confused on Aha! You got it. Thats the whole point. What should have happened? it seems that if I use denoising at 1 as a test only the top part of my image is being changed . Reply reply More replies Unique-Government-13 • Only suggestions I would make is just do 0. A lot of people are just discovering this Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. And then add SD Upscale and it's crazy. I don’t think I’m doing anything different as I used to do with A1111, where results were pretty awesome. Use MultiDiffusion + Tiled VAE instead and say goodbye to seams. 6), then upscale again X2 with 0. Adjust the denoising strength between 0. However, by For img2img, there is no hires fix and someone told me to use the Ultimate SD Upscale script. I think I understand the difference between "pixel upscalers" such as ESRGAN which take regular images as inputs, and "latent upscalers" such as Hires fix which acts as a second pass txt2img. I have tried searching for anyone also having the issue but can't seem to find anything. In Controlnet choose Tile preprocessor and model. 37), ultra high res, ultra-detailed , woman, beautiful detailed eyes, beautiful detailed Ultimate SD upscale is bad for that work. Prompt: (8k, RAW photo, best quality, masterpiece:1. 5 Checkpoint. img1 img2 Locked post. Result will be affected by your choice relative to the amount of denoise parameter. - More info on this here Generate image, send to img2img tab. I’ve been using both Remacri and Ultra Sharp 4x. 2-0. So you seam fix passes. 3 usually gives you the best results. And yes theupscalers you choose will. Of all the models I've tried, 4x-UltraSharp offers the most realistic upscaling. When asking a question or stating a problem, please add as much detail as /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. 6) immediately while using Ultimate SD Upscale. it breaks an image into patches, and img2img each patch to a new size, stitches them back together and then does a pass on all the seams so they blend together. Works on any video card, since you can use a 512x512 tile size and the image will converge. I wonder why there is a need for downloading a script when the built in feature seems to work much hetter. 37), ultra high res, ultra-detailed ,full body, ((full-body shot)), woman, beautiful detailed eyes, beautiful detailed lips, professional I've been banging my head against the wall trying to figure out this very issue. The higher the denoise number the more things it tries to change. Once the image is upscaled to the same size as the image you produced using the SD I upscale with tiled diffusion + tile controlnet, good speed, good quality, no seams. Hello, For more consistent faces i sample an image using the ipadapter node (so that the sampled image has a similar face), then i latent upscale the Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. Lets say I want to get a 2x upscale on a 608*760 image. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this Hello Fellow ComfyUI users, this is my workflow for testing different methods to improve image resolution. Hi, there I am use UItimate SD Upscale but it just doing same process again and again blow is the console code - hoping to get some help Upscaling iteration 1 with scale factor 2 Tile size: 768x768 Tiles amount: 6 Grid: 2x3 Redraw enabled: True Seams Created by: Jerry Davos: Hey Everyone, I would like to share my flux upscaler workflow which I am using to upscale my AI generated images for my projects, hopefully it might also come in handy with you. I am running SD on Windows 11, 64 bit and it used to work like a charm. You will see that girl is under the grid. Raise tile padding and tile blur. 7 (0. 5x, but I either get no added Oh man that's beautiful. What I did was upscaled it using Controlnet tile + Ultimate SD. There's a denoise setting in the script for seam fixing, but that setting overrides the actual denoise for the main image. Colab users If you use the Colab Notebook provided by the site, all you need to do is to select ControlNet and Ultimate SD Ultimate SD upscale produces way less seams than normal SD upscale. 2 if imperfections arise from the prior. Setup is simple. Things: In settings-upscaling, select in Select Ultimate SD upscale will work fine for you for now. s. I also tried it with and without seams fix and same result. It just doesn't make sense to us it as the first i have been using Ultimate Sd Upscale + tile resample method for a quite while, but in the last month i got an issue with it, i have been searching for a solution but i couldn't find any, now when i use this method i get ghosting picture and very messy. The pad/blur is probably what "Upscaled" image from igm2igm using Ultimate SD Upscale Script Parameters:-(1tree:1. Hires. It takes less than 5 minutes with my 8GB VRAM GC: Generate with txt2img, for example: extremely detailed, european woman, floral, elegant, magical, fantasy, ornate, garden /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. 5 is with hired fix, it does true magic on top of an already good first pass. Use the same number of steps that allow sampler to converge. 5 model, for upscale there's multiple methods but lot of time you loose skin texture, ultimate sd upscale is what I use. 1 with the Tile model. I also see the Automatic1111 Ultjmate SD Upscaler extension. 3 Why are you opting for the Ultimate SD Upscaler instead of upscaling with ESRGAN (after an optional initial downsize ¹), then downscaling to your preferred size, and finally using img2img? ¹ In certain scenarios ESRGAN exhibits better performance when the image is The hi-res fix step runs after the scaler, and unless you use an extremely low denoise strength It seems no matter what settings I use with Ultimate SD Upscale in ComfyUI the images always get plastic skin. I then installed an older version (automatic1111 1. This script has upscaling algorithms such as R-ESRGAN and SwinIR_4 built-in. Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. Keep everything as it is, then generate. Add your thoughts and get the Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. 3, then fix details with Painthua. In this example, the skin of girls is better on 3rd image p. You can also create a grid mask for correcting the seams view with inpaint. Essentially, Ultimate SD Upscale applies the full denoise amount to the first tile, but then it decreases for each subsequent tile, dropping rapidly to 0. I switched from ultrasharp to Nickelback and finally to Siax. The claim is that you can increase the denoising to 0. Got a tiled controlnet and patchmodeladddownscale. 4 I actually intended to have a group of normal looking K-pop idols, but I guess AI happened. As in, set a higher denoising strength (~around 0. (Change the Pos and Neg Prompts in this The second paragraph delves into the advanced settings of the Ultimate SD Upscale extension, such as padding, seams fix, and the upscale checkbox. fix but since I'm using XL I skip that and go straight to Img2img, and do a SD Upscale by 2x. Ultimate SD Upscale seems to work, although I'm going to have to play with settings as it changed rather more details than I would have liked. 25 with an 1. This is the kind of thing ComfyUI is great at but would take remembering every /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. The "Seam path" copy is the version before it fixed the seams, and in all of my tests it looks like junk with obvious seams. 4 for denoise for the original SD Upscale. Welcome to r/aiArt ! A community focused on the generation and use of visual, digital So, recently I've been trying use Ultimate SD Upscale but always get this weird background. it preserves detail and left no patterns, and didn't damage camera blur by trying to sharpen it. If I understand correctly how Ultimate SD Upscale + controlnet_tile works, they make an upscale, divide the upscaled image on Thank you for your help! I switched to the Ultimate SD Upscale (with Upscale), but the results appear less real to me and it seems like it is making my machine work 'harder'. Tile overlap may help with removing seams that appear After generating my images I usually do Hires. I have plenty below 2k Flux Ultimate upscaled image that have seams. 4, 7, 8 & 10. I’ve been seeing news lately about ControlNet’s tile model for upscaling. I manually have to fix seams in photoshop Advertisement Coins 0 coins Premium Powerups Explore Gaming Valheim Genshin Impact Minecraft Call of So, I tried to use Ultimate SD Upscale, and something strange occurred. - More info on this here Make sure you have Controlnet 1. Padding - the space of a tile along the border that does not change in order to minimize So I just updated SD and now any time I upscale using Ultimate SD Upscale you can see the tile lines and it looks a little discolored. Try the exact same process (controlnet) but keep the same prompt. My settings are In addition to choosing right Upscale model, it is very important to choose right model in Stable Diffusion img2img itself. Where a 2x upscale at 30 steps took me ~2 minutes, a 4x upscale took 15, and this is with tiling, so my VRAM usage was moderate in all cases. 4-0. In this, the minimum mask area is set to 768x768, but I'm finding all the different methods of upscaling a little confusing. 1 and ultimate upscaler. When Since that time I can't use my usual upscale routine e. It's cheap, fast, but just imitates details. For some reason the Ultimate SD upscale never really works for me, even HighRes Fix I don't get seams. Yes you just add a ksampler denoise approximately 0. Don't worry if the face is distorted. It can upscale from 1k images to 2k,4k,8k,16k I'm having a very strange issue with Ultimate SD Upscale. pth all For PC questions/assistance. If you like the overall composition of the image, you're good to go. In the controlNet tab the preprocessor is 'tile_resample' and the model is 'control_v11f1e_sd15_tile' That's not a great idea, because it'll break when you actually wanted to spend some time rendering, not upgrading & trouble-shooting. I don't use SD upscale but I'll try to answer: There's no need to change sampling steps during upscale. Ultimate SD upscale is a script and your print isn't even showing it. It's better to work on the negative prompt. I've been using ultimate SD upscale (ldsr/esrgan) with the depth model for a while now, but recently I'm not really satisfied anymore with the I think you should reset your tile settings. Reply reply coconutfan27 • 2nd image Reply reply Silly_Goose6714 • There's no overlap option in this script, not with that name, you have do work on "seams fix 14K subscribers in the comfyui community. It discusses the impact of these settings on the final image, particularly in relation to reducing visible lines and improving the blending of tiles. Which Denoise and upscale values? I usually do 0. Ultimate SD upscale is great for upscaling but not when it's a tiling image/texture, in my experience. You are right, I've set it to 0. 2 denoising, no need to go less in my experience and choose Seams Fix Send your image to Img2img, set seed to -1, turn on CN Tile (in this case you don't need to drag your image to CN Tile window), turn on Ultimate SD Upscaler (scripts menu at the bottom of Img2img tab), choose your favorite upscaler, set upscaling factor to 2 I'm using Ultimate SD Upscale with SDXL Lightning without any issues. Tiled VAE, which is included with the multidiffusion After seeing some of the awesome stuff here and on r/HighEndAI, I've stepped into using Coyote-A's Ultimate Upscale extension over SD Upscaler, and I'm mostly happy with the results, but My problem is that no matter how I adjust the Webui settings, I always end up with noticeable SEAMS after the upscale process. Here I just rendered a simple image at 512x using toonyou_beta6 and mostly Ive used controlnet + ultimate sd upscaler but i always get seams, even with band pass. Please help me fix this issue. When the picture is upscaled it introduces new details causing the tiling to not be exact any more, instead you get these very obvious "cut-line" in between tiles. Solution: The issue is that you need to use the --no-half command line argument. This ComfyUI nodes setup lets you use Ultimate SD Upscale custom nodes in your ComfyUI AI generation routine. Steps to reproduce the problem I've been using Blur with Ultimate SD Upscale to generate images up to 12K using SDXL. tile 1 is sampled fully say 20 iterations tile 2 is It forces the diffuser to make details 9x finer, if SD upscale works like Multidiffusion Tiled VAE. Use low denoising <0. The benefit of Hires fix (and For your first problem, if you want a quick and easy solution, the MultiAreaConditioning node is for you. If there's still visible seams, send your upscale back to img2img and use the seams fix at This is what I made for myself, and it's likely somebody else designed something much more flexible/useful. Like, for a whole picture 3 tiles or 2 if your VRAM accepts it. I wanted a realistic image of a black hole ripping apart an entire planet as it sucks it in, like abrupt but beautiful chaos of space. if you want to upscale really big, with lots of detail, like this, you'll need an img2img upscale, like SD Upscale, Ultimate SD Upscale (which are scripts in the img2img tab) or the MultiDiffusion extension, to do it. g. It seems to me there is a way to ensure there are zero seams on pictures. This post came out of frustration how I'm unable to upscale images without loosing details and micro-contrast, and all those little shades. It works great for some stuff, though things with a known scale tend to go wrong, stuff like a tree or a car will be covered in miniature trees. I have NEVER been able to get good results with Ultimate SD Upscaler. The intent is for this to be used on very large images (after Hi-Res fix and Ultimate SD Upscale). Another thing you could try is to merge Step 2 and Step 3. If it doesn't work would even Ultimate SD Upscale + Tile Control net are amazing (you need a monitor or 4k TV to see every detail, click on the image to expand or zoom) Comparison Locked post. You can check the other image below 3x here in the thread, it still has visible blur seam. However, when Hires fix takes a few seconds, this Ultimate SD Upscale is taking like 4~5 minutes using like 1350 iterations. Maybe my googlefu is just lacking. I can't seem to figure out why my Ultimate SD Upscale is losing contrast so badly. It's just a function of how the tiling works, afaik. Download the kohya_controllllite_xl_blur model from the link I provided in the last post, put it in your Controlnet model directory, then fire up controlnet. I recommend, in most situations involving a single character, to make your tiles as wide as your image, rather Essentially, whenever I try to upscale an image, it just renders a completely different image on top of the original, resulting in a very strange collage. Yes, there are a lot of settings. I've done this with the aforementioned extension. However, I don't know how they interact with each other if at all, and there's only one "generate" button that seems to draw from Ultimate SD upscale is better when you have less tiles to work with. i'm using controlnet v1. 0 as model ( You can use any of your choice). or use turbo models. From the ComfyUI_examples,there are two different 2-pass (Hires fix) methods, one is latent scaling, one is non-latent scaling I had exactly same issue and fixed by using a separate VAE for an upscale model (load VAE and connect to ultimate upscale). But somehow it creates additional person inside already generated images. The idea is to first generate a 512x512 image to 'lock in' the main content In Script, select Ultimate SD Upscale. That setting should be off by Just testing ultimate upscaler with different pictures. I have tried different upscale models all with • Not that odd, since 'Ultimate SD upscale' uses the same prompt for every tile. In the mean time, install vlad's version in the folder next to automatic, and set up the Vlad folders to point to automatic's folders for I tried Ultimate SD upscaler but it gave me less impressive results than simply sending the image to the extras tab and upscaling there. I think there's an option to feather the tile edges Posted in r/StableDiffusion by u/ataylorm • 66 points and 31 comments But i have also changed 2 settings, seam fix mode=none and seam fix denoise =0. 由於此網站的設置，我們無法提供該頁面的具體描述。 The main idea with the tile controlnet is that you can keep the prompt the same, and it shouldn't create duplicate people in the background. Posted by u/Neat-Bend-1190 - 4 votes and 5 comments The 'trick' tl;dnr: Once you render something you like, send it to extras and upscale it and then use inpainting to perfect individual portions of it. We will need the Ultimate SD Upscale and ControlNet extensions for the last method. The point in using SD Ultimate Upscale over img2img is you can go over 8K+ resolutions (if you are patient) which you cannot do with img2img, yes, the seams in some images can be bad, especially without using ControlNet Tile, but is it very easy to blend the An overview for Ultimate SD Upscaler, since upscaling tools are becoming widespead! Tutorial - Guide Share Add a Comment Be the first to comment Nobody's responded to this post yet. Select your favorite upscaler (I use 4x-UltraSharp). I’ve also tried just the Extras - Upscale method which My current workflow to generate decent pictures at upscale X4, with minor glitches. I was always told to use cfg:10 and between 0. does anyone have an idea how i can scale the images adding more details without them getting so washed out? here are the prompts: masterpiece When people say to use img2img to upscale, do you just send it to img2img and just increase the size? I tried it where I went from my base, to img2img at max resolution, then used the 4x upscaler but couldn't tell it made any difference Ultimate SD Upscale does not work anymore after updating ControlNet #98 Unanswered paolobesser including downloading Ultimate SD Upscale again. It breaks the upscaled image into tiles, which you can set to a number of pixels your VRAM can handle. Check your 4k picture- tiles everywhere. Tips My favorite solution is to not use ultimate Sd upscale and instead use multidiffusion-upscaler. 4 - 0. 4 without screwing up your image. it fix artifacts on seams and makes the mosaic of tiles less visible. Ahh I see. And to create higher res images, look into HighRes-Fix and then Ultimate SD Upscale. For upscaler I choose NMKD-Siax lately (sometimes I try to upscale my pic with 8 different upscalers and then choose the best of them). Here's what I've tried so far: Changed the model to an Yesterday (jun 08th, 2023) I decided to check for A1111 extensions updates and something went terribly wrong. I use the "Ultimate SD upscale" extension with the "4x-UltraSharp" model. Essentially the process that is described in the workflow is for generative upscaling, where you already have an image that is somewhat large (over 500 px), so that when you denoise and then upscale with ultimate SD upscale, it has some detail to work on. Make sure Denoise scripts > Ultimate SD Upscale > scale from image 2X > 4X Ultrasharp Click Generate. I have switched over to the Ultimate SD Upscale as well and it Controlnet tile resample and ultimate sd upscale is a great way to upscale that is usable on even low vram systems to get 4k images, definitely worth trying out for anyone who hasn’t. There are more settings for ultimate. with the right prompt and denoise settings, it can be phenomenal. 2 you start to see more unintended changes to the This is an implementation of Ultimate SD Upscale with ControlNet Tile using deliberate_v2 as the base SD 1. I want to /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers I saw your example of Ultimate SD upscale below and can't figure out where some of the values go, mask_blur, padding, seams_fix_width, seams_fix_denoise, seams_fix_padding, upscaler_index, This is SO true! I'm STILL surprised how much better things look with just hires fix when I do speed seed runs with it off. u/Woisek have you tried Ultimate I like how you have put a different prompt into your upscaler and ControlNet than the main prompt: I think this could help to stop getting random heads from appearing in tiled upscales. Seam fix Seam fix (Ultimate SD Upscale): Enable if you feel you can see the 512×512 tiles. And lastly, how can you tell me the How can I get rid of seams when I am upscaling with Ultimate SD upscale? Tile size is too big, it's not the idea, make it smaller keeping the proportion. I've used Ultimate SD Upscale a couple of times, but I had never taken the time to experiment with its parameters and see how far it could be pushed. I don't know if the result is incomplete or not, but it seems complete to me (maybe it's Posted by u/Firarara - 41 votes and 3 comments There's many options, Hires fix, Ultimate SD Upscaler, Iterative Upscaler, Latent Upscale (on Pixel Space). This option runs an extra round of upscaling along the boundaries of the tiles. 3 and 1. 5 with the Half Tile seams_fix_mode and now it's working fine! However, upscaling with this Ultimate SD Upscale node takes an incredibly long time with my GTX 1660, the node repeats iself at least a dozen times or more before finish I've struggled with Hires. This is a concept template workflow, you can translate to SDXLs too. This will hide the seams between tiles. I'm running on a AMD 6800xt GPU. Actually Ultimate SD tiled upscale did a lot of heavy lifting on some of these images, such as no. Photon Hires. All I do is send the original image to img2img, remove the original prompt and just keep Hey community, I'm having a tough time with "CONTROLNET TILE + ULTIMATE SD UPSCALE," and I'm hoping you can give me some guidance on this matter. Keep "From ImgtoImg settings" in Target size type (this is where I'm still working and failing at doing really huge upscale). However, since I haven't worked with SD for months, I can't guarantee it remains the best upscaling model. With regular upscale denoising higher than about 0. When developing my photorealism Lora app I did stupidly extensive testing on upscale models. So I tried it. But I'll check this out as this is still different as the other 3 methods outlined in that article. Is there a tutorial somewhere that goes over the difference between hires fix, controlnet tiles, ultimate SD upscale, the process image upscaler tab, and any others I may have missed. I use linear without any seam fix, 64 for pad and blur, and about the biggest tile size my 24gb allows (1344; multiple of 64 for sd). 🔧 Choose the 4X Ultra Sharp option for upscaling and enable seams fix for a cleaner image. And above all, BE NICE. 65 gave decent results, but was so accurate it didn't look I just tried Ultimate SD Upscale extension for AUTOMATIC1111!! with controlnet 1. I always get noticiable grid seams, and artifacts like faces being created all over the place, even at 2x upscale. New comments cannot be posted. 2 and low-ish CFG ~3, use prompt terms related to face/skin details, if you want you can add detail loras (add_detail or more_details) at low weight (<0. Best Yeah, a generic upscaler (like UltraSharp) does pretty much the same no matter whether you apply it to a whole picture at once (hires fix) or parts of it (SD upscale). Nothing fixed the issue. This should save you some VRAM as its upscaling and adding details by tiles. Reply reply More replies More replies Using the Ultimate SD Upscale extension, run img2img on the original image, give a whole new prompt (or reuse the same one as in the second example, and the following settings: Denoising strength: 0. Another one made just now, details are Hi everyone, I've been using SD / ComfyUI for a few weeks now and I find myself overwhelmed with the number of ways to do upscaling. 4 steps with CFG of 1, RealVisxlV40. I'm pretty happy, so long I had a lot of errors with v-RAM when I tried to upscale pictures, and this script usually works like a charm. However ultimate upscaler is different. 20-30 for most samplers and models. If you don't see with naked eye, so then go to Photoshop, add extra curves layer and play with curves to extreme. a person), even at 0. Increasing the mask blur lost details, but increasing the tile padding to 64 helped. You don't "need" it, but it is highly recommended. For no. Just change it's settings and models. (Though idk if he downscaled or not. fix (x2) Ultimate SD upscale (x4) 1200x600 --> 2400x1200 --> 9600x4800 Ultimate SD Upscale is a peculiar beast; it seems that the number of iterations it performs for denoising is calculated using a combination of 'Sampling steps' and 'Denoising strength'. Here are the steps that I took: Step 1 - (txt2img): *this step is to generate the base image. fix and other upscaling methods like the Loopback Scaler script and SD Upscale. I'm using Ultimate SD upscale, scale from image size (2) upscaler: 4x-UltraSharp, Linear, upscaled tick box ticked, Seams fixed unticked. Control net +Ultimate SD: Here I chose Realistic Vision 4. No, you probably don’t need to touch most of them! It's high quality, and easy to control the amount of detail added, using control scale and restore cfg, but it slows down at higher scales faster than ultimate SD upscale does. My current workflow is to get 2x upscale initially with highres fix, then use ultimate SD upscale with 512 tiles, 0. For the XL images I start at denoise 0. I've never used Ultimate upscaler after installing that extension. My problem is that no matter how I adjust the Webui settings, I always end up with noticeable SEAMS You can use SD Upscale script (not Ultimate) without ControlNet, it also make tiles but doesn't have problems with seams or you can use Tiled Diffusion as bitzupa said also you can use CN Tile with Hires fix Hi thanks for the reply. 5x upscale with dreamshaper v8 so i have made it 768x768 in ultimate sd to have 4 uniform tiles but i have Upscale 1 Ultimate SD upscale (1024x1536) img2img Model: cyberrealistic_v13 Prompt: (8K resolution, 16K resolution, extreme high detail, background bokeh) a beautiful red hair, indicate hair, dark eyebrows, natural eyebrows, pale skin, Have been learning to leverage AUTOMATIC1111's hi-res fix and Ultimate SD Upscaler, and I love the results! What settings are you using for ultimate SD upscale? I've been getting mixed results from it depending on the base image. workflow - google drive link I've uploaded the workflow link and the generated pictures I wonder if there are any workflows for ComfyUI that combine Ultimate SD Upscale + controlnet_tile + IP-Adapter. Second you want a good amount of mask blur which is important. I haven't tried much but I've wanted to make images of chaotic space stuff like this. That is way too many. 2 denoise it will still try its best to fit in the subject in each tile if there isn't one already (at least partially). The typical negative Posted by u/Firarara - 22 votes and 3 comments To determine the right checkpoint, prompt, denoising, and CFG to use on your own upscaled image, start with my settings, use GIMP to cut a 1024x1024 sample square from your upscale, drag that into img2img and turn off SD upscale script. You can easily utilize schemes below for your custom setups. Upscaling at too low a denoise does not improve the detail on the original as it should. ) I also noticed you'll have lower chance of getting seams with On a typical SD upscale job i use . In this blog, we will be covering all the details you need to install and use the ultimate SD upscale script. 35 down to the lowest of a . Reply reply Low_Engineering_5628 • Ultimate SD Upscale allows you to specify the tile size (and the op could have played with The SD Photon Hires. Well, the truth is that tiles don't blend well, and therefore I use Ultimate SD Upscale to try to counteract it a little. If you want to actually increase the image with details you'll need to use hires or img2img upscaling with scripts like Ultimate SD upscale. Ever other detail in the image will come out • Examples below are accompanied by a tutorial in my YouTube video. Reply reply More replies More replies Top 1% Rank by size In his workflow in the end the image is directly sent to Ultimate SD upscale . 3. the only time i use 0. But in i'm trying to upscale a few images, but they all get kind of blurry. 4. Basically I start with denoising quite high (0. 16 with the original prompt, and if it goes bad with a lot of artifacts I am almost certain Ultimate SD Upscale has a memory leak but I don't know Python well enough to diagnose it The latest workflow I am running consistently runs into an issue where I run out of system RAM (not VRAM, to be clear, memory RAM). Step 1 - (txt2img): *this step is to generate the base image. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this software to create your AI art. I haven’t heard it discussed much on here recently with the focus on xl but for those who feel left out it’s a great way to get high resolution in A1111 with low vram. It broke both Dreambooth (but I can live without it) and affected ControlNet's ability to upscale images using the I'm running on a AMD 6800xt GPU. I addressed some comments, and images are no longer upscaled to 12k from a 768x768 image, as they considered it excessive. The extras tab, for me, is just for outputing images with larger dimensions. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app Install extension Ultimate SD Upscale (script). 2), (realistic, photo-realistic:1. 2 and 0.
khywdr iaqspt oki yotqxz hivrnye ensyvn rmzokj kor gkdrwv bkmz