1440p vs 4k ps5 reddit. Or check it out in the app stores .

1440p vs 4k ps5 reddit 1440p looks fine, but 4K with some scaling even the desktop will wow you when it comes to stuff like text and icon clarity. Could pick up the 27 today or would need to save up and hope for some good Black Friday deals on pc man, I have been playing CS2/NFS Heat/COD MW 2019, I think at best on 1440p (Ryzen 7 5700X + Nvidia 4070). Edit 1: Thank you for answers. If you only game on a ps5 get a 4K 120Hz monitor. To me, 1440P monitor seems crisper than a 4K tv because the pixels match better. I think 27 inch 1440p is the highest anyone should go for in terms of size. Even a 2 grand rtx 3090ti will only give you 144 if ya lucky. And the 1440p is clearly sharper. Games rendered at 4K downscaled to 1440p look great, the responsiveness of 120hz is lovely, and you have the option to switch to a 4K signal, if you get a monitor that allows it. The ps5 wont ever run games like warzone 120fps on 4k it just never will happen. Now this is a shocker of a take - day to day use, 4k honestly feels the same as 1080p. Upscaling can work well if the pixels are upscaling by an integer (2x from 1080p to 2160p) as opposed to a fraction/decimal (1. In contrast, the difference between 60hz and 120+ hz is massive to most people. I've been weighing up 4k @ 60hz vs 1440p (2k) @ 120 -165hz monitors, and I think I'm going to go for the latter. I haven't moved for 4k gaming because I prefer the refresh rate but the people claiming the difference is minimal are blind or just assuaging their budgets with bullshit. And also not having the advantage of the wide field of view. I don’t see the point in sacrificing a smoother experience for the sake of more pixels on a screen. If you're on the "60FPS is good enough" camp, then yeah, 4K will probably make sense. Because you are running either 4k downscaled to 1440p, with 4K frames per second, which is terrible in many games. Demon's Souls and God of War looked incredible on a 4K HDR10 display when I got to play it. Especially at 27 inch. Higher end version of the one above. 25x more pixels Higher refresh rates have a much higher impact IMO. The Alienware is a one trick pony and it has an anti reflective Just got my series X and looking at monitors. 0 or some other upscaler to achieve a "4k" image. For example, even If yes, a high refresh rate 1440p 27" is the best balance for gaming. 1080p is too low and looks blurry. If you can afford ~$400, I'd say get the best of both worlds and get one of the 28" 4k 144Hz monitors like the Gigabyte M28U, Acer Nitro XV282K KVbmipruzx and Samsung 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. 6M subscribers in the PS5 community. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Expect a 1440p Something to consider is that for the super intense RT graphics stuff, a 4070ti @ 1440p is faster than a 4090 @ 4k - even if you have the deepest pockets you lose some performance going 4k. I have a ps5 and a series x nonetheless the new 4k 240hz monitors of msi,alienware,lg,Samsung etc will cost 3 times as much as a 1440p monitor. Or check it out in the app stores And now I'm stuck deciding which monitor to get. 1080 is the way to go until you get a better gpu. Recently just purchased a PS5 and have a 4k screen already. 0 should suit you just fine. ore room to push DLSS on 4k. 1440 vs 4k at 27 inch is almost unnoticeable in game. In fact, right now, I have both a 1080p and 1440p screen both exactly 22 inches from my face. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other casual I'd be curious what 4k 70Hz monitor you are referring to. . Visual fidelity and visual clarity are two different things. Either by dynamically lowering FPS to get 4k, or dynamically lowering resolution to maintain higher FPS. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other casual discussion. Or check it out in the app stores Now the difference from 1440p to 4k is a lot closer as Ghost Recon Breakpoint runs at 1440p and is hard to tell it's not 4k. I think if u go with 1440p it gets upscaled to 4k, (assuming u have a 1440/4k monitor), and u get to keep 120fps. Not every game supports fsr either mind you. 120 only works on a select few games like Borderlands 3 and CoD. Nope. The 1440-1800p is the internal render resolution which is then upscaled to 4k and sent to your screen. the on the bx only 2 of That’s not to say there’s anything wrong with 1440p, it’s a good mix of fidelity and performance, but the difference between that and 4k is night and day when it comes to pixel density/image quality. So it won’t have any impact at all to performance. Any help or advice would be great! I can't speak to those exact dimensions. In other words, a game running 4K high/medium will look better than a game running 1440p ultra. Discussion It supports Dolby Vision, native 4K and also supports ultrawide mode and can be used with my ps5 and Apple TV 4K in addition to my Gaming PC. Even in titles that don't render natively at 4k, the PS5 dashboard and game UI interfaces all will render in crisp 4k, with the game geometry Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores   After one week of searching the right ultrawide monitor that supports 1440p on ps5, I'm giving up. I have heard some things about fps problems on the PS5 and alot of people saying to avoid it completely, but currently my PC struggles running most recent games above low graphics on 1440p without reaching above 80 degrees. Or check it out in the app stores I'm split between getting a 4k model that can do 4k@60hz and 1440p@120hz VS one that can do 4k@120hz. The monitor itself has a setting to where it can still be set to 4k on each console but I’m pretty sure it’s just downscaled to 1440p. And in this sense it will be. Contrast is ok. A Mini LED IPS panel with a quantum dot layer and those features hangs with an OLED in terms of picture quality. DLSS Performance in 4K is actually a higher internal resolution than DLSS Quality in 1440p. There are just a few 120fps cross-gen titles and once games are current-gen-only you won't see new 120fps releases anymore Most 120fps modes actually run 80-120fps at 1080p with noticable worse visuals. Granted the 1440p is 27" and the 1080p is 24. I definitely overspent on my setup to reach high FPS 4k gaming. 1440p is best for 4K displays. So while 4k isn't the highest standard of visual fidelity it is currently the highest in visual clarity. I don't think any game can run 120fps, possibly a Ps5 pro will have that power and i've seen some videos showing that the 4k may have ghosting effect, if you choose a higher hz say 120hz you may notice interpolation, stuttering juddering and screen tearing even on movies so personally i'd stick with a 4K 60fps TV with a good hdmi 2. While a ps5 can do 1440p you loose out on VRR and there most often the i switched from 4k to 1440p not long ago to get a higher refresh rate, and I can very much tell the difference. Rdna2 Your community-run home for all things PlayStation on Reddit! Console/game discussions, news, support, trophy/media sharing and more! VRR, 120Hz), and even at 28” I notice the difference between 1440p and 4k, but I use my PS5 sitting at close range on a computer desk. 1440p to 4K is not worth the fps loss. Either way it’s great for being interchangeable between the two and gives you a lot of convenience. But from 1440p to 4k I felt it was a massive difference. Sure, if I were to play a game on a small 27" or 34" monitor then the difference between 1440p and 4K is quite small, but playing on a 4K on a 65" TV? I find it to have somewhat of a difference. Or check it out in the app stores   2023 1440p vs 4k high refresh rates . play very fast shooters then 1440p 240Hz is also an option, but IMO you'll notice a difference between 4K and 1440p much more than 240Hz compared to 144Hz. between native 4K@30fps and fake4K@60fps? This is doable by developers to implement on every single game (most probably), as it don’t involve streaming quota or different assets/textures, and resolution and For those two things, 1440p is probably fine. I'm using a Samsung G5 Odyssey, and have been since well before the 1440p patch, it was one of several 1440 monitors that were able to accept a 4K signal and downscale it. MGSV is one of my favourite games of all time and was wondering if since the game is running the ps4pro version which runs natively at 1440p, would it look better 44 votes, 42 comments. Here’s what I’ll say, first of all, the 1440p is NOT a compromise, BUT you will definitely notice the difference between the two. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. PS4 Pro runs 1440p 30fps, PS5 runs 4K 30fps, not sure how they're the same, yeah games can also run at 1440p but it's literally 60fps which was never seen on any console generation before, (only a handful of ps4 pro games might run 1080-60fps on some performance mode but most devs didn't want to sacrifice the graphical fidelity) The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. Also, even the most powerful GPUs struggle to get a consistent frame rate with 4k. Best combos of performance and value. 3ms, Just a beast of a monitor Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. With monitor-sampling being the process where a non-1440p monitor either up or downsamples the PS5's output; and with PS5-sampling being the console offering a 1440p output, but either up or downsampling the graphics internally, 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Dell G2724D for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite monitors. On a 1440p monitor, DLDSR + DLSS Performance I heard it does not support 1440p monitors but not sure anymore. I have a 32" LG32GN650-B, 27" Gigabyte M27Q, and the Gigabyte M28U and I can promise you that at 28", you aren't going to see any meaningful jumps in clarity and visual fidelity from 1440p to 4k in this screen size and considering the ppi (pixels per inch, pixel density). But I do use my 3080 more then my ps5 so I guess getting a 2k monitor would be good. 1440p really only allowed me to use It's not to say there isn't a difference at 16. A PC running 1440p without upscaling tech will look far better than the PS5. Would I see a difference? 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. If money is a concern, I'd say go for the 1440p because a lot of games won't give you true 4K resolution. The M28U was a very viable and important option before the impending update to support 1440p. »Alienware AW2721D – 1440p, 240hz, IPS, G-Sync, Just a beast of a monitor Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. Truthfully only high end gpus can struggle to hit 120fps 4k the ps5/xsx has to make compromises to hit 120fps. 1440p vs 4k upvotes 4K 60 Hz vs 1440p 170 Hz for PS5 and PC It supports 1440p as a native output resolution now as well. I was hoping that games like Resident Evil R3make 2 PS5 version with bad frame rate in 4k raytracing mode would run better in 1440p resolution. I would go 4k for 32in+ monitors. 32 inch 1440p starts to get distorted because of the loss of pixel density. Hello guys, I have an AOC CQ32G1 monitor, and I already know that it is able to run some PS5 games at 120Hz with 1080p resolution. 4k is an even bigger leap over 1440p. It looks great and your frames will still be high. Moving from 1440p to 1080p for my RMA wasn't that big of a shock, in fact I got used to it pretty quick. Many PS5 games like TLOU2 run at 1440p yet look good on a 4K TV because there is enough resolution for a basic upscale to look good. Another part is 1440p to 4k is just a bigger jump proportionately than 1080 to 1440. I also own a PS5 that I use with it. 4k matters once you go larger. Text can look a lot better on 4K. Cost: 1440p monitors are generally less expensive than 4K monitors. 1728 res on 1080p vs 1440p upvote Hi all, so I have two monitors, one being 1440p and the other being 4k, both ips. 1440p 165hz even a 6950xt at 1440p which beats the 3090ti in 1440p framerates cant really pump 240 fps at 1440p in every game outside of esports titles i and forget about 4k at 144 thats just a pipe dream without dropping settings to low or medium without using upscaling which imo if you bought the horsepower why drop to 1080p for rendering and It actually feels like I'm playing on a 27 1440p 16:9 monitor, which I use to play on. Not only now, but for the next couple of years too. Reply reply More replies I don't know the exact numbers for Dirt 5 on PS5, but assuming it is the same as on the Series X it runs 4K 60FPS or 1440P 120FPS in high performance mode, and the system still converts that 1440P rendered image to 4K when outputting to a TV that supports a 4K 120hz input. To my knowledge none exist (except the LG LG 27UK670-B, which is 75Hz and discontinued). So my assessment is that if you want 27 inch, 1440p 32 inch or higher, 4k. 5M subscribers in the PS5 community. Finaly for 4K, I have bought Asus 48" pg48uq. The difference between 1440p and 4K is still noticeable, however I don’t think it’s that much of a leap in terms of visual quality to the end user. 0 is good enough at 4K. Good news is PC parts are more expensive than ever and I should be able to sell it all for a profit. The PS5 has dedicated games designed to look great for the hardware. The Odyssey G7 is a native 1440p monitor, yes, but it has a built in scaler that will scale an incoming 4k signal down to 1440p and then display it, and it classifies itself as a 4k display to the console. 4k on ps5 cant always keep 120 but that depends on the game. However, does it support 1440p on 4K tv? Example: Metal Gear Solid V runs 1440p on ps4 pro so if I played it on my ps5, would the game display 1080p or 1440p on my 4K tv? Thank you. 1440p to 4k is a significant jump in clarity but to me it doesn't "feel" as big of a jump as 1080p to 1440p or at least doesn't feel worth it a lot of the time when you take the bigger performance hit into account. Since 1440p support on console is a scaler function only, games will still render at the developer target, using FSR 2. Hello, I am looking for a monitor and havent decided if I want 4K/60hz or 1440p/144hz. I think the math works out that beyond like 30 inches most people can't differentiate between the individual pixels of a 27in 1440p monitor. Budget should not be an issue, however the 1440p monitor would most likely be 240hz whilst the 4k monitor would he 144hz. 1 unless you want 120 Hz 4K. But I wonder whether the upscaled 1080p image would look better than just running the game at a native 1440p, instead of upscaling it to 4K. But upscaling technologies (like DLSS) get better and better, they are - in my opinion - one of the most important new inventions we had in the last years in the gaming sector. That being said, I can confirm the benq ex2780q 27inch 144hz display at 1440p can accept a 4K signal and scale it to 1440 on the actual Well it's about clarity of the image. 1? upvote That helped me a lot. Running upscaled 1440p to 4k using FSR2 or DLSS is a great way to get almost native looking 4k with 1440 performance plus a small penalty. Now, consider that games targeting 120fps, like call of duty cold war, don't actually run at 4k. The 4k one will be better looking. PS5 on the console dashboard will show you are running at 2560x1440p 60hz but if you play a game that supports 120hz like Modern Warfare 2, it will switch to 120hz. You'll need that monitor to have an HDMI 2. Take a 4k image of the game and put it up to a 1440p image of the same game. This got me researching into ppi (pixels per inch) - turns out that a 27" 1440p and a 1080p 24" display have only 17 ppi difference, 92 to 109, which is very close. I would recommend it in a heartbeat but again, this is just my So, in short, as long as your PS5 is set to 4K and your monitor can downscale from 4K then it will never upscale from 1080p, which was the main problem with 1440p monitors and the PS5, ofc direct 1440p from the PS5 would be better. I have a 3080 and ps5 and I wanted to get a 4K native and downscale it to 2k for gaming on my pc but when I use it on my ps5 I’d just leave it at 4k. If I go with the 4k monitor, I’m afraid that I will not be noticing the difference in pixel density and image sharpness. A bigger difference than 1080p to 1440p in your same distance example. » LG27GP850-B – Native 165hz. I'm happy to focus primarily on higher fps 1440p with occasional 4k TV gaming (even then I find myself leaning toward 120fps 1440p over 60fps 4k). I once played with 4k 60 fps on ps5 and I thought it looked great but for the moment I would choose 240 hz. Setting resolution to 4k looks sharper in my opinion. Oddly PUBG renders at 1440 from the game but the ps5 will technically sample 4k to 1440 on that game Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I do notice the difference in quality between 1440p and 4K just don't know if it's worth it at the cost of frames. I would prefer 1440p 144hz for future PC upgrades, but I'm hesitant to pull the trigger for numerous reasons including whether the downscaled image looks good or not, the likelihood of Sony eventually enabling 1440p on the PS5, and whether the PS5 will even be able to output 4k at > There's 2 ways that you could be playing at 1440p vs 4k, and I'm not 100% certain which you mean. 4k is a lot sharper and I really cannot see any pixels or blockiness, where as with 1440p I can see blockiness in things like text and it's nowhere near as sharp. Or check it out in the app stores 4k oled vs 1440p oled . 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. Then I jumped to a 32 HDR 1440p and now this 34 ultra wide. A separate but related question is how good would 4K downscaled to 1440p look on a 1440p monitor, or 1440p upscaled with fsr to 4K on a 1440p monitor. Reply reply So I've bought a 1440p monitor for my PS5, and while it's on the way I've started to wonder what the picture quality will be like compared to a native 1440p image from a PC. A 1440p/2K monitor using HDMI 2. 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz comments. The reason this question has been crossing my mind a lot lately is that the new Last of Us Remake will render at either 4K or 1440p depending on your resolution output selection, and I want the best possible picture quality out of that game. There are other things that are more standard on 4K monitors though just because they're more expensive. But at the same time I wonder if it would be worth experiencing 4k gaming. TBH 60hz vs 144hz is often the biggest difference of what you listed, at least if you actually play at high fps to match it. I'll throw in another query: if I do plan on getting a ps5 aswell down a few years, should I consider getting the 4k120? I hear doubts about 27in is the sweet spot for 1440p. I would recommend to go with 4K 60Hz. The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub for PS5 & VR2 news and discussion. ADMIN MOD 1440p vs 4k screen for MGSV on PS5 . So, running at 1440p, and letting your TV upscale to 4k, basically is the same exact thing, except 1440p The whole 1440p at native vs. It's also I came from 1440p VA panel to the 4k Alienware oled and my experience was the same. edit: Im going to go for the 1440p monitor, sorry for not responding to all replies I Is there really any difference between 4K and 1440p on monitors smaller than 30 in? Because I'd much rather have 144 Hertz than 4K 60fps unless there's a big visual difference. The big thing I’m stuck between is TV or a monitor? For my price range ($350) I’m stuck deciding between a 43inch 4k 60Hz TV and a 32inch 1440p 120Hz monitor. Get the That’s not really true, because a 32” 1440p monitor has the same PPI as a 24” 1080p monitor, and 24” is generally considered the upper limit for 1080p. If the games runs at native 4K on the PS5, then go for it. 1440P vs 4K . 1440p is still what I'd recommend for most, but the difference is certainly there. VRR is fully enabled so I'll download the ps5 version after work and see how it goes. Best bang for your buck is OLED 42-48 inch. FSR 2. But then you go back to 1440p and realise how much blurrier it is. I am stuck between 27in -32in 144-240hz and 1440p vs 4k. 1080p -> 1440p is also noticeable. I've used it on PS3, PS4 Pro and now PS5. 4k or 1440p/HDMI 2. 4K 60Hz as most games support this. If you really only want one or the other and this is mostly a work setup, 4k was a no-brainer for me. Or you are going to run 1080p performance mode which would look way worse downscaled from 1440p than from 4k. And there's 144Hz 4K monitors coming later this year, but not even a 1080Ti can drive 4K at 100FPS. If you are getting ps5/xsx then I would honestly get 60hz or possibly wait for something good to show up. I’m looking to get a new screen for my gaming room on my ps5. I have both a 27in and 32in 1440p, and 1440p definitely looks better in smaller size, the dpi difference is noticeable. 1 connection, HDR support, variable refresh rate (VRR) and low input lag. bedulge • 1080 is fine, at typical viewing distance, the difference between 4k and 1080 is not massive. I'm not sure what is the better option, I don't think many ps5 games run more than 60fps at the moment so I tend to think the 4k option would be better but I am not 100% sure. On 4K, I get around 50-60 fps depending on which game I play and a little tweaking to my settings. As far as my eyes can see the difference between 1440 and 4k on a 27 inch is equally gigantic. 4k in TVs it a complete gimmick, it's better utilized in computer monitors, but even then it's generally a waste when you 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. Sounds like you want the experience akin to a PC, so I’d recommend the 1440p. I sit further back enough to where I have about the same fov that I do with 27inch. It's really not "bad", and I seriously doubt you'll have the time to notice, frame by frame, whatever marginal differences one sees on 4K vs 1440p (assuming you have all the necessary hardware, costing as much as an OLED TV, and the cables to transmit reliably to Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now though. Brothers, I am struggling and can’t decide whether to go with the ultrawide or the 4k. Don't get me wrong, 4K is the crisper image, but it is MUCH harder to distinguish 1440p from 4K than the instant distinguishing of 1080p to 1440p I have owned the following: 16:9 1440p 60hz 16:9 4K 60hz 21:9 1440p 100hz The 1440p Ultrawide is hands down the best display period. Reply reply /r/GuildWars2 is the primary community for Guild Wars 2 on Reddit. And the visual quality is incredible still. When you set the ps5 to 4k, the ps5 will push out 4k image/bandwidth. Not amazing, but not terrible, either. Still looks decent though, can't really tell its not native resolution from a glance but it's really stupid that the console doesn't support 1440p. On top of that, because gaming is 90% of usage -- I was losing a ton of fps for the pleasure of more clarity. I’ve seen a lot of people confused by this as well. Meanwhile a 4k monitor at 27" has a ppi of 163 - much closer to an iMac's resolution. Most actually run at 1080 or 1440p and are upscaled to 4k. There is no clear answer to that I guess. 5x in the case of 1080p to 1440p). Another thing, if you plan to use the monitor for console gaming, you can also game at 4k, since PS5 outputs a 1080p when connected to a 1440p monitor. Is 4k worth it for gaming now or is 1440p still it? I have a 4K sony oled and I just got the PS5 as well. Thats partially because 1440p monitors are mostly at 27 inches, and so are 4k, but 1080p monitors are typically 21-24 inch. 4K WOLED vs. Current list of all games that support 120hz are listed here with additional info on what resolution if it helps: All PS5 Games That Support 120 FPS - Join us as we uncover the smoothest Just to clarify, the PS5 games will look bad too if the monitor can't accept a 4K signal, forcing the PS5 to output only in 1080p and upscaling it to 1440p. It'd still be a larger percent increase between 4K and 1440p (~45%) at 27" vs 1440p and 1080p (~37%) at 27", but there are also diminishing returns. Right but why not just buy I'm in the beta for 1440p support but I have a monitor that support 4k downscale, which one is better? Outputting a native resolution is likely to be better because a GPU can rescale more Simpy put, if you want to sit on the sofa and be far from the screen, it's better to have a larger 4K display. So I have a 3080 Ti, and my 4K monitor broke, it was an IPS panel, and I had to decide between buying a 4K OLED, or 1440p, I chose the 1440p. HDMI 2. Everything apart from gaming is just such a step up having moved from 1440p to 4k at the same screen size (27in). The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. However now the big decision to make is : 4k 60hz monitor or 1080p 144hz , keen to get a 27 inch monitor but a bit worried that 1080p on a 27 inch monitor will look a bit coarse. Size matters. I will get a 4K sometime down the line, but for now, it's not really a big deal Then I have bought the asus 1440p 360hz, and it's perfect for CSGO, in BF5/2042, it's very very good, awesome with Sandstorm. Don't get me wrong the 32in still looks good, the 27in just looks better. 1 Port. I'm looking to upgrade my PS5/PC monitor and I'm trying to decide between 1440p vs 4k. i wanted to use FF16 as a test for this, since i figured going down to the lower res would help performance, but i can't see any discernable improvement to performance in that game. VA panel. It's easier to find better HDR support, higher brightness, higher color accuracy, better ergonomics, etc if you go with a 4K monitor. 4k@ 27in is not very noticeable compared to 1440p@ 27in unless you sit very, very close to your monitor. I'll take the My brother plays on a 1440p 120hz monitor on PS5 and it doesn't actually output 1440p, only 1080p. the new Consoles (at least PS5) is getting a 1440p update so you can use that Monitor for that too since you mentioned it. The best combo monitors is pg48uq for 4K and racing and casual games, and pg27aqn for FPS games For me the visual difference on a monitor between 1440 and 4K is barely distinguishable, but the difference between 60fps and 144fps is huge. Members Online. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 5 inches between 1440p and 4k, but at regular viewing distance the PPI is so high that i don't see it worth the extra horse power Which is better for PS5 4K or 1440p? As many games struggle to maintain high frame rates with a 4k resolution, a lower 1440p resolution makes reaching higher refresh rates I'd recommend a good 1440p monitor over 4K. Would you rather go slightly smaller and run a PS5/XSX/PC on 1440p or wait and get the larger 32in 4k but also have to build a completely new PC (current set up is an i7-9700k/2070S) Money isn’t an issue but it’s also not freely available. They actually run between 1080p and 1440p, then get upscaled to 4k. But you will need at least a 1080Ti. Your community-run home for all things PlayStation on Reddit! Console/game discussions, news, support, trophy/media sharing and more! No chance I'm noticing the difference between 1440p and 4K at that distance. I dont play competitively or anything but what do you think would look the best I am comparing the asus vg27aql 27” vs Samsung s70a 32” Would it be good for a ps5? Reply Forward_Cobbler1319 Ryzen 5800x | 3080 | 32GB 3200MHz The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. That gives you higher image quality - and because Sony does not support 1440p, it is your only chance to not having to play on 1080p. If you are going to be close to the screen, go for a 1440p display. Basically zero games run at actual 4k on the ps5 anyway. If you hooked up a ps5 to a 1440p monitor it would just stretch the systems output resolution and look weird. No it isnt mate lol 4k is just visually pleasing 1080p and 1440p are still the most competitive resolutions and most used. Even if you can get good FPS on 4k today, tomorrow it will that much harder to run, and the details on 1440p is generally enough, it's a huge difference from 1080p and at 27 inch pretty much nearly 1440p is no where near 1080p in terms of usage, it will be a long time bruh 1440p is at 12% while 1080p 65% yeah "soon" btw 2020 was a few years ago and from what i know 1080p was the standard back then as well, i didnt hear anyone debated over 720p or 1080p about that stuff because clearly it was 1080p is it worth upgrading to a 1440p monitor Does the ps5 upscale 1080 p naitive to 1440p with no issue in image quality I wanna play the new lord of the fallen in 1080p in 60fps and I don't know if it will look better in a 2k monitor Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Setting the ps5 to 1440p will have the TV do it which isn't the best idea as the pixel count for 1440p doesn't perfectly upscale to 4k which leads to a It makes no difference. The only reason to pick 1440p would be hardware restrictions, or spending/cost restrictions. Probably 2160p, since I’d guess when you select 1440p it’s running the games that don’t have 1440p modes at 1080p, which will look blurry on a 1440p screen Reply reply   OP, not all games support 120fps, so it really comes down to your personal usage. Or check it out in the app stores I don't like it. I have a RTX 3060 and a PS5, and plan to play on either 1440p or 4k respectively. There said native 4k was never that big of a boost over 1440p. STILL. I heard people say PS5 can use 1440p but I also heard very often that the PS5 is only able to use 1080p or 4k and on a 1440p monitor it is using 1080p. 32” 4k is noticeably clearer than 32” 1440p, but 4k isn’t really mandatory unless the monitor is over 32”. My biggest issue is finding a monitor that is compatible with PS5 due to HDMI 2. I feel I need a decent amount of AA though to smooth things out as much as possible because upscaling alone makes things blocky. For example, if you were to put a 1080p game or a DVD into a PS5 with 4k capabilities, it'll take that original media and upscale it to 4k, which means it's Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I’m running a 3090 with an 8700k just fine, 170+ frames in most games while fully maxed, and that’s an OLD ass chip. 4K 144hz I’m of the opinion that 1440p = 720p, and 4k = 1080 It’s the new standard. But what if I get a oled 2k monitor vs a 4K ips monitor. In fact they are still rendered at 4K and supersampled down to 1440P. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. 240Hz looks really clean compared to 144Hz, whereas I’m shocked people can even play at 30-60Hz. Waste of money if you can’t use it fully. Monitor for PS5 and 1440p PC gaming. if NVIDIA provided a simple lanczos based scaling like PS5/Xbox is doing for upscaling 1440p output games to 1080p and 4K screens, I'd actually use that. For my overall setup, I use a ps5 and switch along with my pc. If you play slower paced games, racing, puzzles, cities . 1440p vs 4k is really resolution vs framerate and what GPU you have Fsr upscaled will look better but perform worse. The latter is a 1440p 240hz 27 inch monitor, and the m28u is 4k 144hz 28 inch. I'm thinking If I should by a 1440p OLED gaming monitor or a 4k gaming monitor. Best combo of performance and value. If all you're changing is the output resolution on your PS5, then with the following question The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. This means that games will look sharper on a 1440p monitor than on a 1080p monitor, but not as sharp as on a 4K monitor. I don't know how easy it is to switch between the modes, but if it's not that much of a hassle, I'd do this: in competitive Multiplayer games, like fps games, you should go for 120 fps, because it can help you play better if you have more fps, and in single player games, where the atmosphere might be more important, then 60 fps should be enough, and First struggle was between 4k IPS or 1440p Oled- have seen some issues reported by people with the 4k 240 Oled Alienware and am conscious of being an early adopter. You don't need HDMI 2. PS5 does not support VRR at 1440p. 25x, looks better than DLDSR Quality at native resolution. 1440p is a nice step up from 1080p, and the PS5 supports it so you should definitely go for it. Since the PS5 does not support 1440p natively an upgrade to a 1440p 144hz monitor ( which I think is the sweet spot ) is out of the question. That really sucks. In 120hz mode in CoD (which you should be playing on) the game maxes out at 1440p anyway. I'll be going for a 32 inch monitor so it's going to visually look good regardless. The feature added to PS5 to output to 1440P is purely the video it puts out NOT the render resolution of the game. 0 would allow for a maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz, but the PS5 will output a max of 120 Hz, and only in compatible games. This is because our eyes are limited in » Dell S2721DGF - IPS, 1440p, 165hz, Freesync - Higher end but built on a great legacy. Xbox Series X | S sub with the right name Discussion • Fan made • Games • Leaks • PC • News • Rumors • Reddit All things Xbox consoles and PC. I feel like you would have to upgrade your gpu more often in order to keep pushing 4K on new titles. The monitor will accept 4k image and shrink it to fit 1440p. My concern is whether this monitor is able to accept 4K signal from PS5 and afterwards downscaling to 1440p (good image quality), or is it only able to accept 1080p signal from PS5, therefore upscaling to 1440p (bad image quality)? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. It depends If the PS5 does use the 1440p resolution or not. Would you recommend getting a 4k monitor which a 60Hz refresh rate, or getting a monitor with a higher refresh rate 120hz+ but only with a Quad HD resolution. 1440p vs 4k even on a 27 inches does make a noticeable If you have the means, go for the 4K, you won't regret it. So my biggest question is if anyone who actually knows shit about monitors know if either of these are actually good. Recently I've been playing a lot of console games on my ps5 so I've been using my 4k. Often OOS »Samsung Odyssey G5 – Curved and sometimes on a great sale. It will also output 1440p bandwidth. I know some other genres like shooters, most pros prefer 1080p or 1440p over 4k. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now the difference from 1440p to 4K is night-and-day. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your 4K > 1440p Being 4K or an OLED do not, by themselves, guarantee good picture quality or a good gaming experience. I need this confirmed If image interpolation is used for upscaling then 1440p to 4K will look better than 1080p to 4K because there is significantly more input information. Hz will work to make your FPS a little smoother cause it is So I wonder is it better to buy desktop 32" 4k or LG C3 and playing 1440p in more demanding titles, or is it better to buy 1440p desktop 27" Of course 27" 1440p monitor is better for my current specs, but it's not that future proof like 4k 32". Despite what others may say, even 4K at 27" is a massive visual upgrade. 1440p 27" is already 109 PPI, that's not amazing but it's actually a sweetspot for GPU performance, it's not insane clarity like a 4k 27" which has 150 PPI or so but it's also not 720p -> 1080p is very noticeable. The developer supported, community run subreddit dedicated to the Fortnite: Battle Royale game mode by Epic TV doesn't actually support 1440p, jumps straight to 4k so I'll stick with 1080. However, most games are locked to 60. 4k is great if you are far enough away, 1440p is better if you are closer to it. And honestly, that sucks. 0 can upscale decently at 4K from 1440p Although I find that DLSS Quality 4K (which is upscaled from 1440p) looks definitely better than native 1440p But you are using an AMD card and not Nvidia so don’t really worry about DLSS, FSR 2. Programmers using 1440p monitors is there's actually big difference compared to 1080p? Other From the moment this year started i decided i wanted to switch my 1080p 144hz monitor to something cleaner, but 4k is damn expensive so i won't handle it in nearest year. As someone who got a 4k montior instead of a 1440p, I would say generally don't go for 4k unless you have a productivity usecase for the 4k screen. » LG ‎27GR95QE-B - OLED, 240hz, . HDR is a must tho. If you go 4k, go 32 inch at minimum. 1440p without upscaling will just look worse than 1440p on a native 1440p panel. If you set ps5 to 1440p, the ps5 will do the shrinking. 4k scaled things is giving me doubts because, as demonstrated by some of the replies in this thread, a popular opinion seems to be that '4k scaled is a little blurry but still a lot crisper than a lower-res display at native res'. You will have a major positive experience gaming with a 1440p gaming ultra wide versus a 4k 60hz that probably isn't a gaming monitor with high response times. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other Go with 1440p. I just bought a 1440p monitor today. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz Most performance modes on ps5 don't run at 4k anyways usually 1440p-1800p some do run native 4k 60 but AAA games like horizon forbidden west does not render at native 4k so the ps5 upscales it. Tbh with Sony's fuckery it seems just getting a native 1080p screen may be preferable. 4K QD-OLED - Everything You Need to Know The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. 4k 60 hz vs 1440p 120hz . Remder resolution is seperate from the display resolution. What I'm torn about is which to get. Which coming from ps5 that’s incredible. On a small monitor like that the difference between 4k and 1440p will be tough to notice. The pixel density at 1440p is already high enough even for the most detailed games. maybe roam around Limgrave a bit But I searched a bunch of forums/reddit/DF for Performance vs Quality modes/comparisons for both Demon’s Souls and Spider-Man MM. A community for pros and newbs. (1080p vs 960p), so DLSS Performance, while using DLDSR 2. If you are OK working with x1 1440p and 4k each, splitting the difference isn't a bad idea. 5 inch. When comparing similar aspect ratios, 4K has 2. Especially in games. 1 port if u The difference between 1080 and 1440 when I upgraded laptops was huge. The 4k is a 16:9, (3840 X 2160). There is a lot . But with a 4090, you could definitely game on 4K. Performance: The PS5 can output games at 1440p up to 120fps. This at least dulls the problem until we get actual 4K monitors or Sony patches in 1440p native output. So I think your question is really 4k 60Hz vs 1440p 144Hz. 5. However I’m curious if you believe the competitive gaming scene is going to prefer 1080p over 4k. Secondly, is 4K worth it for a monitor or would it be bettter to save the money and just get a 1440p monitor instead? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now (720p in that case for PS5 like you said) and upscales it to 4K. 1440p 144hz » LG 27GN800-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. I also feel like it would be a shame to get an OLED with a matte cover and think the MPG 321URX QD-OLED looks like a better long term goal. This is a good option for gamers who want to play games at high frame rates. 1440p is just a half way point like 720 was. Or check it out in the app stores   unlike scaling to 1440p. Measure your distance to your screen. Vrr works with both resolutions on this monitor. So for Singleplayer adventure-type games I don't mind 30FPS as long I have a 40" 4K monitor and 1440p doesn't look too bad. Or check it out in the app stores Does ps5 even do 4K downscale to 1440p? I thought it was either output 4K, or downscaled right down to 1080p. Native 4K itself is difficult to achieve with constant high framerates, even for some high end PCs. The difference is noticeable. However, when talking about large TVs at longer viewing distances you cannot tell the difference between 1080p and 4k on a 65" TV from 9'. Because most of its games are running closer to that resolution than 4K. I think it depends on the game. r/FortNiteBR. On the flip side, 144Hz is definitely an experience all on its own. Been hoping I can downscale from 4k to 1440p for ps5 but in nvidia control panel I cant select 3840x2160. I'm also wondering I can definitely see a massive difference between, a 1440p monitor and a 5k 27" iMac. The home for everything Metal Gear on reddit Members Online • lilpp_36. The 1440p is a 21:9, (3440 X 1440). 1440p is a great middle ground between 1080p and 4K. Even playing games like League on 4k, I don't notice it that different from 1080p. Yea for movies,videos, and TV shows4K is better than 1440p for that. distances when compared to a monitor but I do notice an improved I think PS5 actually looks better on a 1440P screen. The output res will still be 4k ( if your tv supports it). But I went from 1440p 27" to a 4k 48" TV and there is a pretty massive difference in quality, you get use to it quickly and it just seems normal after awhile. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B When I used my 28" 4k I had to use windows scaling for everything because the PPI was so high. Judging by your 4k 60hz monitor, I doubt it's a gaming monitor with fast response times and a good panel. Just curious if this is will be the case with SF6 so i decided to swap my PS5 over to the main monitor i use for my PC, which is 1440p, but also supports high refresh rate and HDR, vs my tv, which is 4k. It’s saying I can’t do HDR and 2160p. Hi there something to consider some 1440p monitors do accept a 4k signal then downsample or something with the ps5 for 60hz, then they also do 1080 120, for the 4k option you could look at the lg c1/cx 48 should be on sale for around £800-1000 still alot I guess And if you want 48inches, i think I seen the lg 48 A1 for £650 but is only 60hz The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub for PS5 & VR2 news and discussion. There are very few native 4K PS5 games especially the newer ones. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. A PS5 is pretty powerful, but not that powerful, uses all kinds of "tricks" to boost FPS or 4k. I see that Alienware is releasing a 1440p and a 4k oled in the beginning of January, along with asus releasing a 4k oled by then as well. I mainly play competitive titles and watch tv/youtube on pc and single player games on ps5, but am planning to play triple a games on pc once it’s built, and sticking to ps5 exclusives. it still runs pretty poorly and As 1080p vs 4k really does give the gpu alot of headroom Reply reply More replies. The size doesn’t matter to me as I can sit as close or far as I want. loa rxunes bldkg hzpsv ouzel zmdqipi uju knq fygkez xpnp